Forest Hills Connection || News and Life in Our DC Neighborhood

Covering Forest Hills, Van Ness, North Cleveland Park and Wakefield

  • About Us
    • About Forest Hills Connection
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Donate & Subscribe
  • Classifieds
  • News
    • ANC 3F
    • Business
      • Business in Brief
      • Out to Eat
      • Shop & Eat Local
    • Getting Around
    • Main Street
    • Neighborhood in the News
    • Opinion
    • Parks and Streams
    • Real Estate
    • UDC
  • Style
    • Food
    • History
    • Meet the Neighbors
    • Neighbors Recommend
    • Services
    • Things To Do
  • Home Front
    • High-Rise Life
    • In the Garden
    • In the Kitchen
  • Backyard Nature
    • Local Wildlife
    • Wildlife Photos
  • Kids & Pets
    • At School
    • At Play
    • Kids Write
    • Pets
  • Calendar

Forest Hills was nicknamed “Hanukkah Heights.” But Jews and Black people weren’t always welcome.

February 1, 2021 by FHC 3 Comments

Forest Hills was a patchwork of racially restrictive covenants beginning in the 1920s. In some of the squares (numbered above), owners were barred from selling to certain people. (Map from the DC Office of Tax and Revenue’s Real Property Assessment Map Viewer)

by Ann Kessler

The history of DC real estate is marred by restrictive covenants that prohibited the sale of property to Jews, Black people, and other frequent targets of discrimination. Forest Hills was, by comparison, more welcoming. At one point the neighborhood even earned the nickname “Hanukkah Heights,” so it’s long been assumed that Forest Hills deeds were free of the clauses that specified who was not allowed to buy, rent or lease property in our community.

That, unfortunately, is not true. A review of the original deeds for properties in Forest Hills reveals that there were racially restrictive covenants in many of them.

Advertisement

I used the research method developed by Mara Cherkasky and Sarah Shoenfeld for their Mapping Segregation in Washington DC project to find that racially restrictive covenants were in use in Forest Hills during the 1920s.

The DC Recorder of Deeds has a full text database of deeds issued between August 5th, 1921 and October 28th, 2000. One can search by owner’s name or the square and lot of a specific property. My search revealed that beginning a century ago, the location of the lot and which square it occupied in our neighborhood of approximately 39 squares, determined how restricted you were in choosing a buyer for your property.

Newspaper articles and real estate ads of the time made no secret of the fact. At the time of Hedges & Middleton’s development of Forest Hills in 1925, there were restrictive covenants included in some deeds. As The Washington Post reported then: Forest Hills “…has all improvements and is amply tested by sensible and conservative deed restrictions.” A 1929 ad by realtors Shannon & Luchs called the neighborhood “…a restricted, high-class detached residential section” and also said “…this should make any one looking for a high-class residence in a restricted section act at once.”

While it is true that Jews were not banned from buying properties in most of Forest Hills, for some reason they were specifically forbidden to acquire homes in square 2274, bounded by Linnean Avenue, Garrison Street and 30th Place NW. J. Edgar Hoover lived there. His 1940 deed for 4936 30th Place NW (square 2274, lots 0013 and 0014) read:

“That said land or any building which may be erected thereon shall never be used, occupied by, sold, demised, transferred, conveyed unto or in trust for, leased rented or given to any person or persons of the Semitic race, blood or origin, which racial description shall be deemed to include Armenians, Jews, Hebrews, Persians and Syrians, or to negroes or any person or persons of negro blood or extraction, however this agreement shall not be held to exclude partial occupancy of the premises by domestic servants of the owner of the said land, his heirs and assigns.”

It should be noted that the 1942 deed for the Lyndon and Lady Bird Johnson house across the street from Hoover on 30th Place had no restrictions at all, being in square 2275 rather than 2274.

Another square demonstrating racial discrimination is square 2276. There it was the Chevy Chase Land Company of Montgomery County, Maryland using the same language denying Jews, Black people and others the right to buy a house.

The restrictive clause in the Chevy Chase Land Company deed.

Interestingly, lot 0004 in square 2276 (3116 Fessenden Street NW) would be sold to the distinguished Black journalist, Carl T. Rowan, in 1970.

A search of the deeds for some other Forest Hills squares shows discrimination against Black buyers, but not Jews. Thus it depended on which entity or person you chose to buy your property from whether there were restrictions against people of “African descent.” This discriminatory wording could vary by grantor (that is, the person selling the land). Several of these original 1920s sellers owned a large number of lots and were obviously real estate speculators. Names like George B. Bryan, Allan C. Minnix, and Adam P. Ruth appear in the deeds for lots in whole squares of Forest Hills.

Some of the Allen C., Hazel C., Mary C. and William S. Minnix 1927-1929 deeds in square 2269, for instance, read: “Subject also to the covenants that said land will not be sold, rented or conveyed, the whole nor any part thereof or any structure thereon to any person of African descent.” The George B. and Nannie W. Bryan deed for square 2251, lot 0001 in 1931 contained similarly worded language. The Adam P. and Della C. Ruth 1933 deed in square 2255, lot 0001, reads “That said land shall never be sold, rented, leased or conveyed to or in trust for any negro, colored person, or person of negro extraction.” Thus the language varied but the intent did not. The owners of these lots in Forest Hills had to promise not to sell to Black people.

It should finally be pointed out that these restrictions were not found in every deed in Forest Hills. Indeed, they were not found in the majority of the deeds. However, the fact that these clauses were in any deeds, while a reflection of the past history of discrimination in housing, is upsetting. Restrictive covenants were declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1948’s Shelley vs. Kraemer decision. While it did not end discrimination, we can be relieved that these discriminatory and hateful deeds are gone.

Forest Hills Connection is produced by volunteers, and supported by you. We appreciate your support – financial and otherwise. Here’s how to donate.

Filed Under: History, News

Comments

  1. paul says

    February 1, 2021 at 10:00 am

    Thanks for the research.

    Reply
  2. Karen says

    February 1, 2021 at 3:32 pm

    Thank you for tackling this project and for sharing this deeply important work, particularly in a time in the world where many do not seem to equate racial discrimination with opportunity to thrive and produce generational wealth. Deep bows of gratitude.

    Reply
  3. Harold says

    February 2, 2021 at 9:23 am

    A very interesting reminder of D.C. custom and culture not that long ago. However, the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelley v. Kramer had no impact on restrictive covenants in the District. It was decided under the 14th Amendment, which applied only to the then 48 states. There was a companion case, Hurd v. Hodge, brought by black plaintiffs seeking to purchase property in the District subject to such covenants. Their case was heard with Shelley v. Kramer and the Court ruled in their favor, relying upon the Civil Rights Act of 1866.

    As noted in the article, private discrimination continued, because sellers of real estate could still discriminate in choosing their buyers. Those practices were not ended until the landmark civil rights legislation of the 1960s.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Forest Hills Connection

  • Who we are
  • How to advertise
  • How to donate
  • How to submit a story idea
  • Contact us
  • Tweets by foresthillsnews

    Subscribe to Our Blog

    Receive an email alert whenever we publish a new article.

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Arrives in your inbox around mid-month.


    Newsletter Archive         

    Connect With Us!

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSS

    Local Links

    • Schools, Services and More
    • Restaurants

    Latest Comments

    • lilk on Meet Your Neighbors updates: The artists of Forest Hills and Van Ness
    • lilk on Apartment updates: New “nuisance” building at Van Ness; Tenant leaders request meeting with mayor
    • Barbara Kraft on A fundraising record, a playground partnership, more movie nights, and other news from Van Ness Main Street’s 2022 annual meeting
    • Green Eyeshades on Apartment updates: New “nuisance” building at Van Ness; Tenant leaders request meeting with mayor
    • Green Eyeshades on Apartment updates: New “nuisance” building at Van Ness; Tenant leaders request meeting with mayor

    Archives

    About Forest Hills Connection | FHC + VNMS | Who We Are | Contributors
    Submissions Policy | Contact | Advertise | Donate
    © Forest Hills Connection | Site by: VanStudios
     

    Loading Comments...