Covering Forest Hills, Van Ness, North Cleveland Park and Wakefield

  • About Us
    • About Forest Hills Connection
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe to Our Newsletter
    • Donate
    • Advertise
    • Comments Policy
    • Submissions Policy
  • Classifieds
  • News
    • ANC 3F
    • Business
      • Business in Brief
    • Main Street
    • Neighborhood in the News
    • Parks and Streams
    • UDC
  • Style
    • Food
    • History
    • Meet the Neighbors
    • Services
    • Things To Do
  • Home Front
  • Backyard Nature
  • Kids
  • Local Attractions

Group Pushes City To Address Sidewalk Gaps

February 18, 2013

by Brady Holt
Current Staff Writer

missing sidewalkPedestrian safety activists are pressing for a change in the D.C. Department of Transportation’s policy for installing new sidewalks.

Currently, residents seeking sidewalks on their block must submit a petition with signatures from at least 51 percent of the block’s households, and get advisory neighborhood commission support.

This runs counter to the spirit of the Priority Sidewalk Assurance Act the D.C. Council passed in 2010, says Marlene Berlin, who heads the Pedestrian Advocacy Group at Iona Senior Services. Instead, she said, the city should be actively working to install sidewalks, particularly in certain areas — and stopping only in cases where residents file petitions opposing them.

“To me, people should be able to walk to school, walk to transit, walk to recreation facilities without having to walk in the street,” Berlin said in an interview.

An Iona volunteer recently compiled a map of Ward 3’s sidewalk gaps, highlighting those within a quarter mile of schools, parks with playgrounds, rec centers or Metro stations. The map is available at tinyurl.com/ward-3-sidewalks. (And Iona would appreciate your help in ensuring the map is accurate. Please visit tinyurl.com/ward3sidewalkpriority.)

The 2010 sidewalks law already requires that the District install a sidewalk on at least one side of a street that’s being reconstructed. But it also identifies “priority areas” that should be first on the Transportation Department’s queue when funding is available.

In addition to schools, rec centers and transit spots, priority goes to areas that are hazardous to pedestrians and blocks where residents have petitioned for sidewalks. Those priority areas should get sidewalks by default, Berlin said. “We want to change the norm,” she said. “The norm [should be] that of course sidewalks will be built, and if people don’t want them, they can request that.”

Brandywine Street before...

Brandywine Street before…

... and after the sidewalk was added.

… and after the sidewalk was added.

But the Iona proposal to change policy wouldn’t eliminate what Berlin called the “sidewalk wars” that have raged in recent years between pedestrian advocates and residents who want to preserve the ambience and open space in front of their homes. After some debate, the city last month installed sidewalks on Brandywine, between 30th and 32nd streets, but neighbors successfully resisted them on the other streets.

Ward 3 D.C. Council member Mary Cheh, who introduced the 2010 sidewalks bill, said she applauds the Iona proposal to improve continuity of sidewalks.

“It’s an important effort just in general, because as I’ve always said, we’re not a community of cars — we’re a community of people,” she said in an interview.

Cheh’s own neighborhood of Forest Hills in particular remains one with numerous sidewalk gaps, she added, despite the designation of several streets there as “safe routes” to Murch Elementary School.

Because the sidewalk issue is at this point a Transportation Department policy rather than a District law, Berlin said Iona will make its pitch to the agency — likely this spring, after soliciting community feedback. (Click here to read and comment on the changes Iona proposes for DDOT sidewalk procedures.)

Agency spokesperson John Lisle said the department is currently working on long-term strategies and welcomes such suggestions.

Reprinted from the February 6th, 2013 issue of the Northwest Current

Share this post!

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Related


Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Filed Under: Current Newspapers, News, Pedestrian Updates

Comments

  1. Karen says

    February 19, 2013 at 10:14 pm

    Thank you for this sidewalk! We are thrilled to be able to safely walk east on the north side of Brandywine from Connecticut to Broad Branch. There are many other blocks in Forest Hills missing sidewalks–this is a great start.

    • Marcia Wiss says

      February 21, 2013 at 2:47 pm

      I share Karen’s views of the importance of sidewalks in our neighborhood and the need to fill in the gaps where sidewalks are missing, which forces pedestrians to cross the road or walk in it.

About Forest Hills Connection

  • Who we are
  • How to advertise
  • How to donate
  • How to submit an article
  • Our comments policy
  • Contact us

Connect With Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on Instagram

Latest Comments

  • FHC on June in the Neighborhood: A toy swap, children’s concert, yoga in the park, Create by the Creek, and more
  • Green Eyeshades on Resources for the 2026 primary: Ward 3 voter information aggregator and tenant leaders’ questions for the mayoral candidates
  • IiMGoph on June in the Neighborhood: A toy swap, children’s concert, yoga in the park, Create by the Creek, and more
  • FHC on Resources for the 2026 primary: Ward 3 voter information aggregator and tenant leaders’ questions for the mayoral candidates
  • NL Sam on Resources for the 2026 primary: Ward 3 voter information aggregator and tenant leaders’ questions for the mayoral candidates

Archives

About Forest Hills Connection | FHC + VNMS | Who We Are | Contributors
Submissions Policy | Contact | Advertise | Donate |
© Forest Hills Connection | Site by: VanStudios
 

Loading Comments...