Forest Hills Connection | News and Life in Our DC Neighborhood

Covering Forest Hills, Van Ness, North Cleveland Park and Wakefield

  • About Us
    • About Forest Hills Connection
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe to Our Newsletter
    • Donate
    • Advertise
    • Comments Policy
    • Submissions Policy
  • Classifieds
  • News
    • ANC 3F
    • Business
      • Business in Brief
    • Main Street
    • Neighborhood in the News
    • Parks and Streams
    • UDC
  • Style
    • Food
    • History
    • Meet the Neighbors
    • Services
    • Things To Do
  • Home Front
  • Backyard Nature
  • Kids
  • Local Attractions

Want a sidewalk on your block? Petitions are no longer required, but still a useful tool

December 7, 2015 by FHC

by Marlene Berlin

In this example, the area in yellow belongs to the homeowner. The area in red is public property. See "The closet city park is right outside your front door."

In this example, the area in yellow belongs to the homeowner. The area in red is public property. See “The closet city park is right outside your front door.”

For years, the District has required homeowners to petition for sidewalks in their neighborhoods, but why? Why should individual homeowners get to rule on whether or not the public has a right to sidewalks on public space in front of homes? And where did the petitions come from in the first place?

The petitions go back to a time when DC homeowners paid half the cost of constructing a sidewalk in front of their homes. When DDOT assumed the entire cost of constructing new sidewalks in 2002, the petition requirement remained on the books.

In 2009, District transportation policy changed to require a sidewalk on at least one side of any street where pedestrians can legally walk. The policy prioritized sidewalks along roadways that were being rebuilt anyway; streets close to transit hubs, schools and parks; and any street where traffic posed a hazard to pedestrians.

However, we soon learned politics could overcome policy. That year, then-Mayor Adrian Fenty nixed a network of sidewalks in North Portal Estates, an area bereft of sidewalks. The neighborhood was filling up with new families who wanted them, but the old guard who didn’t held sway.

The policy did set the framework for the DC Council’s Priority Sidewalk Act of 2010. Council member Mary Cheh introduced the bill in 2009 – and when it became law sidewalk activists breathed a sigh of relief. Now, they thought, a single homeowner with the right political ties could no longer block the construction of a sidewalk.

There was no sidewalk on this side of Albemarle until 2013, but that did not stop pedestrians.

There was no sidewalk on this side of Albemarle until 2013, but that did not stop pedestrians.

They were surprised to discover, however, that they still needed gather homeowner signatures. In 2011, when the residents of the community and Iona’s pedestrian initiative pushed DDOT for a sidewalk on the north side of busy Albemarle between 38th and 39th Streets, they were told by the Ward 3 transportation planner that they needed a petition. The old policy, requiring a majority of homeowners on a block to sign on, was still on the books.

Iona Senior Services pushed for revisions to this policy through the Ward 3 priority sidewalk report presented to DDOT in 2013. Still, when DDOT’s priority-setting policy became official in in January 2015, petitions remained part of the process. Departmental Order #1-2015 gives priority to locations that provide access to schools, parks and recreational facilities and transit stops, or are a safety hazard to pedestrians. The policy also takes into consideration community support, which is not defined. Priority is also given to residents who petition to have a sidewalk. In essence, petitions are not required but provide additional weight.

These policies will be tested as DDOT begins work on the first batch of sidewalks identified as priorities under its new policy. The list DDOT provided to Forest Hills Connection focuses on arterials such as Military Road, which has no sidewalk between 28th and 30th Streets. Arizona Avenue between Loughboro Road and MacArthur Avenue is also in the first batch. In addition to being an arterial, it is a bus route with bus stops, and less than a quarter mile to an elementary school. Sidewalk gaps on arterials, a city’s busiest streets, provide the greatest safety hazard to pedestrians.

Homeowners who live on the targeted blocks will be given a 60-day notice period. DDOT has not sent any notices yet, so it will start with areas that abut DDOT land with no homeowners. If you want a sidewalk on your block, here’s where petitions might come in handy.

George Branyan, the DDOT pedestrian coordinator who has taken on this project, told me he thought petitions from homeowners, once they receive notice, could hasten the process. In other words, a strong show of support from homeowners on a block would enable DDOT to start work before the 60-day comment period ends. So, petitions are still with us and could play a useful role in getting sidewalk sooner rather than later.

What remains unclear is how DDOT will handle segments which are heavily weighted as priorities, but do not have community support as opposed to those projects that have community support but are not high priorities in other respects.

Share this post!

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related


Discover more from Forest Hills Connection | News and Life in Our DC Neighborhood

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Filed Under: News, Pedestrian Updates

Comments

  1. Jane Solomon says

    December 7, 2015 at 9:52 am

    Sounds like it may be time to dust off the petition signed by dozens of residents about six years ago to get a sidewalk on Davenport Street between Linnean and 30th Street. Despite the broad support in the neighborhood, despite support from the ANC, despite the block being a high priority gap identified by the Safe Routes to School program; despite high speed commuters coming and going from the park both morning and evening, the residents of the block dug in their heels and made enough ugly noise that DDOT eventually walked away. It’s a public thoroughfare and public safety comes first. I wish I could attach the street view of the block on Google maps that ironically shows a woman pushing a stroller in the street.

About Forest Hills Connection

  • Who we are
  • How to advertise
  • How to donate
  • How to submit an article
  • Our comments policy
  • Contact us

Connect With Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on Instagram

Latest Comments

  • FHC on Getting Around: Albemarle Street repaving dates; Weigh in on DDOT’s Strategic Bikeways Plan on Dec. 10 or online
  • Stephanie Custis on Getting Around: Albemarle Street repaving dates; Weigh in on DDOT’s Strategic Bikeways Plan on Dec. 10 or online
  • Paul on School updates: Sheridan’s new addition; UDC’s new signs; Latest journalism from Jackson-Reed
  • Maria Pilar on Getting Around: Albemarle Street repaving dates; Weigh in on DDOT’s Strategic Bikeways Plan on Dec. 10 or online
  • FHC on Business in Brief: Bajaj’s Rosedale restaurant to close and transform; Rosemary streatery dismantled; Avis Budget returns to Van Ness

Archives

About Forest Hills Connection | FHC + VNMS | Who We Are | Contributors
Submissions Policy | Contact | Advertise | Donate |
2023 © Forest Hills Connection | Site by: VanStudios
 

Loading Comments...