Forest Hills Connection | News and Life in Our DC Neighborhood

Covering Forest Hills, Van Ness, North Cleveland Park and Wakefield

  • About Us
    • About Forest Hills Connection
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe to Our Newsletter
    • Donate
    • Advertise
    • Comments Policy
    • Submissions Policy
  • Classifieds
  • News
    • ANC 3F
    • Business
      • Business in Brief
    • Main Street
    • Neighborhood in the News
    • Parks and Streams
    • UDC
  • Style
    • Food
    • History
    • Meet the Neighbors
    • Services
    • Things To Do
  • Home Front
  • Backyard Nature
  • Kids
  • Local Attractions

What makes U.S. voting exceptional? That so few of us even bother

September 15, 2016

Voting in 1923. (Library of Congress)

Voting in 1923. (Library of Congress)

Jay Thal has been serving the Forest Hills community for 20 years as the precinct captain of Precinct 138, overseeing voting at the Capital Memorial Church on Chesapeake Street, and as he states, “Always supported by a great staff.”

This is the second of three opinion pieces Thal is writing on voting in DC and in our country. Here’s the first. (Thal’s views are his own and do not represent those of the DC Board of Elections.)

by Jay Thal

Without question, the ratification of our Constitution in 1787 set a standard for other nation states yet to be born. Not since the Greeks were people empowered to select some of their leaders and representatives. We called it a representative democracy.

It was a revolutionary concept. Some of us have been fortunate enough to have seen elections occurring in other countries. Others have sat back in amazement while watching TV news as people elsewhere, in the midst of civil strife, line up to vote.

Voting was a hard-fought right for many Americans as well. Yet what makes voting in the U.S. so exceptional is the low percentage of citizens who currently bother to cast a ballot.

In the early days of our republic (1789-1826) voter participation was quite low. In fact, midterm turnout always exceeded presidential elections. Perhaps local government was viewed as more immediate to people’s needs. Then, for a brief period (1828-1838) the turnout was in relative balance – in the 55% range.

Since the 1840 election year, presidential election turnout has always exceeded midterm elections. Amazingly, that same year, 80% of the electorate voted. That was close to the norm through 1896.

From the beginning of the 20th century and now in the 21st, presidential turnout has never exceeded 65.7%. Fifteen of 25 elections have seen turnout in the 50% range – just like 180 years ago.

And in the 44 years since 1972, no midterm election has had voter turnout exceeding 42% of the electorate. Turnout at seven of those 11 elections was below 40%.

Excluding the small islands in the Caribbean and Cuba, the 23 nation states in the Americas have free, fair and regular elections today. Only Guatemala appears to have lower national voter participation than the United States. Is that exceptionalism?

It is not just in the Americas. Of the 35 developed counties of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) only three – Japan, Chile, and Switzerland – have lower voter participation rates than the U.S.

Those sorry statistics generally reflect upon national (presidential) election years. Much lower, yet, is participation in off-year (or primary, local and special elections) where decisions have direct affect upon daily lives – water quality, potholes or your child’s education.

Three states – Oregon, Washington, Colorado – have attempted to increase voter participation by providing every registered voter with a mail-in ballot. However, this does not include residents of voting age, but not registered to vote. It saves those states administrative costs but in 2014 many apathetic voters didn’t bother to return their ballots by mail. The voting rates for each state were 50%, 47%, and 47% respectively.

Perhaps coupling mail-in ballots with mandatory participation and fines for failure-to-perform is needed. Several of the 17 American countries which currently have compulsory voting impose penalties, though some are lax with enforcement:

  • Argentina – Pay fine of 10 to 20 pesos and possible loss of some political rights
  • Bolivia – cannot receive salary through a bank for three months
  • Brazil – Can’t run for public office or get employment as public servant, difficulties collecting wages, getting a passport, credit
  • Peru – Pay fine of 20 soles and cannot receive some public services
  •  
    Some European countries such as Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Greece and Italy also use fines and other penalties for not voting. Some are harsh, such as loss of college scholarship and expulsion or not being able to get a new passport or driver’s license.

    Until the District makes voting compulsory with fines, perhaps we should consider “incentivizing” voter through a lottery for just “showing up” – yes, another “crazy idea.” For $50,050 per citywide election, the DC Board of Elections could offer $350 in randomly selected prizes at each of the 143 precincts for merely casting a ballot.

    For the 2014 midterm elections, turnout was the lowest in 72 years. The national turnout was 36.3%. DC’s rate was 30.3%. To paraphrase T.S. Eliot: This is the way representative democracy ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.

    Share this post!

    • Tweet
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
    • More
    • Print (Opens in new window) Print

    Related


    Discover more from Forest Hills Connection | News and Life in Our DC Neighborhood

    Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

    Filed Under: News, Opinion

    About Forest Hills Connection

    • Who we are
    • How to advertise
    • How to donate
    • How to submit an article
    • Our comments policy
    • Contact us

    Connect With Us!

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on Instagram

    Latest Comments

    • JA on Main Street updates: Retail studies, ‘Taste of Van Ness Main Street,’ playground cleanups, spring pop-up market
    • Paul on Main Street updates: Retail studies, ‘Taste of Van Ness Main Street,’ playground cleanups, spring pop-up market
    • Charlie on Main Street updates: Retail studies, ‘Taste of Van Ness Main Street,’ playground cleanups, spring pop-up market
    • David Falk on Backyard Nature: Fleeting ephemerals and amorous amphibians
    • Sandy on A missing mail collection box and the Van Ness UPS Store move make for a fruitless mail trek

    Archives

    About Forest Hills Connection | FHC + VNMS | Who We Are | Contributors
    Submissions Policy | Contact | Advertise | Donate |
    © Forest Hills Connection | Site by: VanStudios
     

    Loading Comments...