Forest Hills Connection || News and Life in Our DC Neighborhood

Covering Forest Hills, Van Ness, North Cleveland Park and Wakefield

  • About Us
    • About Forest Hills Connection
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Donate
      • Donate & Subscribe
      • “Scoop the Poop” Signs
  • Classifieds
  • News
    • ANC 3F
    • Business
      • Business in Brief
      • Out to Eat
      • Shop & Eat Local
    • Getting Around
      • Metrobus and Rail
      • Pedestrian Updates
    • Elections
    • Main Street
    • Neighborhood in the News
    • Opinion
    • Parks and Streams
    • Real Estate
    • UDC
  • Style
    • Food
      • Farmers Market Finds
    • History
    • Meet the Neighbors
    • Neighbors Recommend
    • Services
    • Things To Do
      • Local Attractions
    • Travel
    • Featured Photos
  • Home Front
    • High-Rise Life
    • In the Garden
    • In the Kitchen
  • Backyard Nature
    • Local Wildlife
    • Wildlife Photos
  • Kids & Pets
    • At School
    • At Play
    • Kids Write
    • Pets
  • Calendar

A letter to the editor: Daro responds to our July 10 piece on the Council’s housing vouchers services bill

July 23, 2019 by FHC Leave a Comment

To the Editor:

We represent Daro, the firm that manages Sedgwick Gardens. Since we began participating in the Housing Choice Voucher Program and accepting vouchers, we have been subjected to criticism about our policy, most recently in a story that was published in your paper last week (“Council hearing Thursday on requiring on-site services for housing voucher tenants”). Typically, we do not respond to such criticism. However, last week’s article contained several inaccuracies about our screening process and our interaction with the community that we would like to address.

First, Daro does accept vouchers from eligible tenants at our properties, including at the Sedgwick, and we do screen these potential tenants in the same manner that we screen potential tenants who are not part of the voucher program. This screening process does not include a request for medical records, as we are barred by federal law from asking for this information. This includes records that would disclose information about their mental health. Similarly, we cannot use a prospective tenant’s criminal past as a reason to deny them housing unless the crime is severe enough and has been committed within the past seven years. This has been the case since the D.C. Council passed the Fair Criminal Record Screening for Housing Act of 2016.

Advertisement

This brings us to the article. There are two problematic sections that we feel compelled to correct.

In the first, the journalist wrote, “One Sedgwick resident, herself formerly homeless and receiving housing assistance, told The Washington Post that some of her neighbors had not been properly screened.” This language is ambiguous and does not explicitly say who failed to screen many of the tenants with vouchers who have moved into the Sedgwick. This could lead some readers to assume that Daro was responsible for this oversight. However, the WaPo article to which your article links is clear that the accusation was directed at city officials and not Daro:

WaPo: “Starkes, who is black, said some of her fellow tenants with vouchers were not properly screened by city officials before moving in.”

Second, the final paragraph notes that there have been numerous community meetings about issues surrounding vouchers, and that representatives from Daro have not attended these meetings. It seems that there is one again an ambiguity to parse out here. Daro has, in fact, initiated several formal (11/1/18, 2/18/19 and 5/30/19) and numerous other Sedgwick community meetings over the past year, communicates and addresses all resident concerns quickly, and works diligently with DHS and other agencies on a daily basis. We believe that working in a highly localized manner allows us to better understand the issues our tenants face, and consequently, have not felt the need to attend other public meetings that are broader in scope.

Tenants have a right to express their grievances about vouchers or any other issue, and we hold that they should. When we know there is an issue, we can work better to address it. We trust that you will correct these inaccuracies to set the record straight.

Kimberly Macleod, on behalf of Daro Management

Forest Hills Connection is produced by volunteers, and supported by you. We appreciate your support – financial and otherwise. Here’s how to donate.

Filed Under: Featured, High-Rise Life, News, Opinion, To the Editor

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Forest Hills Connection

  • Who we are
  • How to advertise
  • How to donate
  • How to submit a story idea
  • Contact us
  • Tweets by foresthillsnews

    Subscribe to Our Blog

    Receive an email alert whenever we publish a new article.

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Arrives in your inbox around mid-month.


    Newsletter Archive         

    Connect With Us!

    Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on RSS

    Local Links

    • Schools, Services and More
    • Restaurants

    Latest Comments

    • Roberta Carroll on DDOT recommends dropping two concepts from Connecticut Ave. reversible lanes and bike lanes study
    • (Ms.) Tucker Harris on Meet the leader of the team that’s been working to clear Broad Branch Stream of invasive plants and protect the natives
    • Evi on At the Broad Branch and Linnean streams, beauty in the cold
    • Gawain Kripke on At the Broad Branch and Linnean streams, beauty in the cold
    • FHC on At the Broad Branch and Linnean streams, beauty in the cold

    Archives

    About Forest Hills Connection | About Forest Hills Neighborhood Alliance | Who We Are | Contributors
    Submissions Policy | Contact | Advertise | Donate
    © Forest Hills Connection | Site by: VanStudios